{"id":"W2094130486","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2006.03.001","title":"Explaining inertia in closed-end fund prices","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Finance research letters","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Net asset value; Economics; Bond; Inertia; Monetary economics; Closed-end fund; Stock (firearms); Asset (computer security); Database transaction; Econometrics; Transaction cost; Financial economics; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Finance; Market liquidity; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00235182,0.0002579105,0.0006429526,0.0009270855,0.0004837119,0.003399086,0.0007403998,0.00129923,0.005563719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03866486,0.0003951632,0.0004033048,0.0005745873,0.001264271,0.003407699,0.00104911,0.001950592,0.0004711477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007309769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002735193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001692971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994821,0.0001209788,0.0000352229,0.000130215,0.00007531861,0.0001561777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979764,0.01447635,0.002652697,0.001299747,0.0008460974,0.0009611938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014817,0.0005961544,0.3877535,0.0001853543,0.0002681211,0.001767826,0.004496827,0.0563433,0.006929382,0.4429252,0.01137201,0.08588058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002410938,0.0001917836,0.1948309,0.00004589296,0.0001061353,0.0004300977,0.001157772,0.2745588,0.001281975,0.5241382,0.002926475,0.00009087197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773825,0.000196356,0.01319265,0.001561992,0.00006023017,0.00001079602,0.00006544835,0.0001045523,0.007425446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988238,0.0000286452,0.0004986874,0.00003978467,0.00005481438,0.000002610284,0.00002727774,0.00001610217,0.0005083287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005563719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01861244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0959460278470329,"score_gpt":0.2946462284816116,"score_spread":0.1987002006345787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}