{"id":"W2094140449","doi":"10.1002/app.37980","title":"Polymer nanocomposite‐based shielding against diagnostic X‐rays","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Polymer Science","topic":"Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Grand River Hospital; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Nanocomposite; Electromagnetic shielding; Conformable matrix; Nanomaterials; Polymer; Composite material; Polydimethylsiloxane; Lead apron; Attenuation; Nanotechnology; Radiation protection; Nuclear medicine; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001054188,0.0003591235,0.0001155219,0.0002709223,0.0001105459,0.000183471,0.0001368357,0.0001942074,0.0009538279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001851108,0.0001837399,0.0001527694,0.0001104736,0.0001317312,0.0002000919,0.0001454025,0.0002299373,0.0002755241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001431666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001236797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002089785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005096739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999288,0.00000687992,0.000004088049,0.00001912367,0.00003043985,0.00001071731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999853,0.00003307778,0.0000496031,0.000008311309,0.00003478888,0.00002118315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003068419,0.000007742628,0.00006135852,0.00004271297,0.000003630232,0.00001658318,0.000005257232,0.000139192,0.9983618,0.00003057955,0.00002173726,0.001278704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004202752,0.00008988614,0.0005604968,0.000003482593,0.00001047625,0.00005192996,0.00000446592,0.0006869339,0.9977427,0.00001029038,0.000832771,0.000002382585],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833578,0.002067337,0.01105833,0.00006595998,0.00006897282,0.00003313704,0.0001137637,0.0002044611,0.003030226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909677,0.000754978,0.005758458,0.00002697121,0.000009825073,0.00001612744,0.00008783807,0.00002232689,0.002355776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009538279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003190875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01219014784017693,"score_gpt":0.2518307226340197,"score_spread":0.2396405747938428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}