{"id":"W2094215945","doi":"10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.153","title":"Getting Inside the Black Box: A Field Study of Practices in “Effective” Audit Committees","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Audit committee; Chief audit executive; Joint audit; Audit; Audit evidence; Internal audit; Information technology audit; Audit plan; Business; Accounting; Corporate governance; External auditor; Public relations; Work (physics); Political science; Finance; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03974511,0.0005229336,0.0005837248,0.002473621,0.01308506,0.004460372,0.002371256,0.002361513,0.001630384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08438732,0.001268356,0.0003419581,0.001793254,0.0125732,0.003757173,0.002937727,0.003537861,0.0002977909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008118463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009196722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03586147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06813499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597258,0.03093505,0.001356925,0.002138481,0.002742767,0.003101025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8641938,0.09257942,0.01595403,0.005304097,0.01434504,0.007623628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002047754,0.00159481,0.02802089,0.0001342788,0.000009907263,0.0004122843,0.9496124,0.0001000167,0.001970993,0.0009035388,0.0007230482,0.01631304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007518347,0.001624051,0.04265831,0.0001913881,0.00001358453,0.0002429958,0.9454904,0.0003994417,0.0009618597,0.000616535,0.007650696,0.00007565775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976634,0.00005342663,0.0005396506,0.0003492253,0.000009491443,0.0002027395,0.000009614634,0.000006021558,0.001166518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970888,0.0001003143,0.001374364,0.0003520825,0.00001445918,0.0001947281,0.00001478091,0.000007442023,0.000852943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03974511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2101947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0122565621812042,"score_gpt":0.2722936003044587,"score_spread":0.2600370381232545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}