{"id":"W2094215945","doi":"10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.153","title":"Getting Inside the Black Box: A Field Study of Practices in “Effective” Audit Committees","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":250,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Audit committee; Chief audit executive; Joint audit; Audit; Audit evidence; Internal audit; Information technology audit; Audit plan; Business; Accounting; Corporate governance; External auditor; Public relations; Work (physics); Political science; Finance; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01093366,0.000301016,0.0005169772,0.0004157851,0.0003293652,0.0003505225,0.0008700638,0.00007905714,0.00008977773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.213487,0.0002357407,0.000154804,0.0008793607,0.0001448106,0.004513593,0.0004884477,0.00145372,0.00006078956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001410861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009802856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001303558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003558018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965886,0.000565201,0.00117476,0.0003217783,0.0009193851,0.0004302174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9190846,0.007601498,0.07221506,0.0004346008,0.0006424439,0.00002177989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005765508,0.01072459,0.1648037,0.0017067,0.003487004,0.004217925,0.06294045,0.07453897,0.005495966,0.1137353,0.008600668,0.5439833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01952572,0.00288964,0.2728343,0.005804519,0.003997095,0.0006003495,0.319364,0.0004275945,0.001648362,0.1064665,0.2642383,0.002203684],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573509,0.0003215456,0.01764726,0.009375519,0.0004117449,0.0006910342,5.164541e-7,0.00003949981,0.01416201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936265,0.000058047,0.0005326103,0.004195998,0.00145296,0.00001682358,5.1481e-7,0.00004910198,0.00006749715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5417796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9613228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0122565621812042,"score_gpt":0.2722936003044587,"score_spread":0.2600370381232545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}