{"id":"W2094259132","doi":"10.1159/000066673","title":"Patterns of Clinically Detectable Treatment Effects with Galantamine: A Qualitative Analysis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Galantamine; Cognition; Cognitive decline; Dementia; Psychology; Clinical Global Impression; Randomized controlled trial; Alzheimer's disease; Rivastigmine; Disease; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Donepezil; Internal medicine; Placebo; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000294093,0.0002690846,0.0006175745,0.0004789424,0.0001044657,0.00002722656,0.00005059502,0.00006509416,0.0009262052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001446784,0.000198311,0.0002516742,0.0009352908,0.0001208144,0.00008651194,0.00004204172,0.000106583,0.00001644017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002465732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003661882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002325297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001585612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979854,0.000257159,0.0004522678,0.0004854569,0.0004163939,0.0004033636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984823,0.0007024463,0.0002017804,0.0001533182,0.0002667024,0.0001934639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007646374,0.001363665,0.9271401,0.0002145986,0.007616353,0.00003503515,0.003148675,4.138082e-7,0.0002027339,0.00001113998,0.00001653448,0.05948613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0116602,0.009154372,0.9537907,0.0001117435,0.0147084,0.000009773164,0.008413524,0.0003090579,0.001352923,0.00004347053,0.0001394986,0.0003063609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868112,0.001160144,0.007775008,0.0001346101,0.0000218589,0.001101312,0.0000640731,0.00002802841,0.002903772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962279,0.002361671,0.0002032603,0.00009264425,0.00002465117,0.0002000979,0.000110919,0.00002059796,0.0007582541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05917977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01223182686504922,"score_gpt":0.3247059832385135,"score_spread":0.3124741563734643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}