{"id":"W2094340708","doi":"10.1007/s10346-003-0008-7","title":"Three-dimensional mapping of a landslide using a multi-geophysical approach: the Quesnel Forks landslide","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landslides","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"British Geological Survey","keywords":"Landslide; Geology; Ground-penetrating radar; Terrain; Seismology; Seismic refraction; Digital elevation model; Reflection (computer programming); Geophysical survey; Electrical resistivity tomography; Geophysics; Geomorphology; Radar; Remote sensing; Electrical resistivity and conductivity; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004287275,0.000303901,0.0004015581,0.00005982439,0.0003271605,0.00005114705,0.0004388624,0.0001969389,0.00015248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004710392,0.0001743213,0.0002394275,0.000438359,0.0003103222,0.0001977434,0.0003432274,0.0003916046,0.00008310971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000132865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004920323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003680053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000583547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979684,0.0000372614,0.0004499558,0.0004546697,0.0005320669,0.000557645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990536,0.000100877,0.0002095055,0.0004673725,0.00002465572,0.0001439638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005236201,0.001917077,0.6672857,0.0001808166,0.0006013301,0.0001687254,0.006555076,0.2680144,0.04077015,0.003016719,0.001498916,0.009467476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02123685,0.0007820383,0.6667631,0.001176792,0.0007733728,0.001160174,0.002263929,0.2382518,0.01321304,0.03069094,0.02007266,0.003615352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476409,0.0001969132,0.04917917,0.0002749497,0.0001627739,0.0003820568,0.00002245488,0.00009850172,0.002042274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640785,0.00001546713,0.0352985,0.0002413056,0.0001415854,0.00002039378,0.00002411522,0.00003815423,0.0001419068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02976262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7108617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02613905712389436,"score_gpt":0.2341472625148623,"score_spread":0.208008205390968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}