{"id":"W2094501363","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.1-17.v1","title":"Identifying spatial priorities for protecting ecosystem services","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; Australian Research Council; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Prioritization; Environmental resource management; Service (business); Business; Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Ecosystem management; Identification (biology); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Ecosystem; Ecology; Process management; Geography; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01793377,0.001018635,0.0007944942,0.007771295,0.001626442,0.004757378,0.001755904,0.001731179,0.005940422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03978284,0.0004345483,0.0009731056,0.007046038,0.002813889,0.007123796,0.004599429,0.001960268,0.0009177243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008021603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01122553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0183873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04205132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901677,0.005162211,0.001009762,0.0006007652,0.002452892,0.0006065222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766201,0.01222472,0.002681316,0.0009992454,0.00684539,0.0006292571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001319102,0.00007448874,0.033948,0.01477096,0.0003252734,0.0005568029,0.007084026,0.008404719,0.003645188,0.2995314,0.03613343,0.5953937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005987639,0.0001985955,0.06716298,0.01608994,0.0004720357,0.0008928396,0.03278207,0.006201745,0.005881634,0.3378795,0.5321883,0.0001904134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1137862,0.1656571,0.3575026,0.08249385,0.002271924,0.002319074,0.004665025,0.000622208,0.2706821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5635445,0.08062397,0.3405604,0.004525482,0.0002848239,0.001012205,0.002154373,0.0001633337,0.007130876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0183873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09484398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05531805782151552,"score_gpt":0.3186071446900827,"score_spread":0.2632890868685672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}