{"id":"W2094509841","doi":"10.1061/40680(2003)137","title":"Environmental Dredging in the St. Lawrence River: A Case Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Environmental and Sediment Control","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dredging; Sediment; Environmental science; Yard; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental remediation; Hydrology (agriculture); Engineering; Contamination; Geology; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145086,0.0005103034,0.0003050859,0.001181068,0.006708351,0.002174673,0.001959169,0.002634327,0.001951397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001601524,0.000434156,0.0004471306,0.002471749,0.001389757,0.0009558581,0.001193773,0.001208406,0.0003148507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008213647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005740517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4255637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7933999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988122,0.0003916422,0.00005334872,0.0001056663,0.0002744637,0.0003627291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987361,0.0003350571,0.0002133923,0.00007562703,0.0003746833,0.0002652586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008782932,0.007133177,0.4955716,0.001074081,0.0001839127,0.2133227,0.06918326,0.0175953,0.008246541,0.009089159,0.01663345,0.1610885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001817561,0.004118855,0.442373,0.0007139836,0.0002213396,0.02921098,0.3619934,0.01574465,0.007559604,0.002008707,0.1356022,0.0002716903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867591,0.0005363409,0.0007470201,0.0009393517,0.00001774454,0.0001468704,0.0001684075,0.0000392467,0.010646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824716,0.001564523,0.002256483,0.0003763609,0.00001411812,0.00006849879,0.0001818424,0.00001531116,0.01305118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5744363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8461733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007657350675648838,"score_gpt":0.199495838916481,"score_spread":0.1918384882408322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}