{"id":"W2094539909","doi":"10.1016/j.jterra.2005.05.001","title":"Dynamic modeling of soil–tool interaction: An overview from a fluid flow perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Terramechanics","topic":"Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tillage; Rheology; Plasticity; Deformation (meteorology); Computational fluid dynamics; Geotechnical engineering; Flow (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Geology; Computer science; Environmental science; Mechanics; Materials science; Physics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003360773,0.001407063,0.002515817,0.001432389,0.0006763158,0.002289201,0.002419086,0.00251682,0.002815025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006826798,0.0007951951,0.001417933,0.001884411,0.001031391,0.002641025,0.001217679,0.0008818645,0.0009329959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005328958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008022632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006346693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003562079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997287,0.00005552443,0.00002034183,0.0000642061,0.00009489634,0.00003623685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999803,0.00008889047,0.00003435846,0.00001579979,0.00004233375,0.00001571022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002076295,0.00004134309,0.0005639133,0.0002557895,0.00004056127,0.0001529288,0.00007796707,0.9427444,0.003345152,0.01798904,0.0007201247,0.03404812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005049996,0.0000151104,0.0001498156,0.00002317835,0.00001272255,0.00006113524,0.00002371672,0.9888268,0.0004601124,0.005953605,0.004454509,0.00001422965],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01171863,0.008597116,0.9687528,0.0003787449,0.0001053678,0.00003364454,0.0001452197,0.0003364828,0.009931978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7323372,0.05173895,0.1872478,0.0003415378,0.0008130163,0.0004256686,0.0006771367,0.0005667355,0.02585193],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006346693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0126195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02533100882963155,"score_gpt":0.2793744745292192,"score_spread":0.2540434656995876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}