{"id":"W2094539909","doi":"10.1016/j.jterra.2005.05.001","title":"Dynamic modeling of soil–tool interaction: An overview from a fluid flow perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Terramechanics","topic":"Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tillage; Rheology; Plasticity; Deformation (meteorology); Computational fluid dynamics; Geotechnical engineering; Flow (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Geology; Computer science; Environmental science; Mechanics; Materials science; Physics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002576106,0.0001989866,0.000393788,0.0001788594,0.00003526437,0.0000440332,0.0002984369,0.0001410844,0.00007848167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004021047,0.0001961797,0.0002276199,0.0001428774,0.000006212429,0.000560057,0.0000421347,0.0004684209,0.000007224214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004178341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004827727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003578081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001139034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986438,0.00003271498,0.0006710227,0.0001415557,0.0003083911,0.0002025484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990618,0.00002857933,0.000219922,0.0002741389,0.0003101509,0.0001054555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006568853,0.000126181,0.000002428532,0.00003551238,0.0002071312,0.00001329136,0.001396183,0.9289412,0.008979819,0.001906942,0.00003351225,0.0582921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004605464,0.0001876802,0.000005427189,0.00019783,0.00007879522,0.00008186269,0.001466981,0.9892007,0.0006331838,0.007377755,0.0001156211,0.0001936643],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8241871,0.002565492,0.1717155,0.0001407912,0.001110076,0.00007992483,0.00003953563,0.00006129823,0.0001002959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805755,0.001714668,0.01730629,0.00006744984,0.0002682715,0.000001779063,0.00000573406,0.00005466665,0.000005615205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1563884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7999975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02533100882963155,"score_gpt":0.2793744745292192,"score_spread":0.2540434656995876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}