{"id":"W2094600225","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.02.024","title":"Evaluation of a solution isoelectric focusing protocol as an alternative to ion exchange chromatography for charge-based proteome prefractionation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chromatography B","topic":"Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Science and Industry Endowment Fund","keywords":"Chemistry; Chromatography; Isoelectric focusing; Proteome; Ion chromatography; Hydrophilic interaction chromatography; Protocol (science); Ion exchange; Ion; High-performance liquid chromatography; Biochemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001352135,0.0002156282,0.0003162885,0.0008829427,0.0001680576,0.00004435789,0.0002602082,0.0001456217,0.00008847017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001383746,0.0002076692,0.000328255,0.0008567201,0.00003508049,0.0005561656,0.000010132,0.0001942473,9.464122e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002025909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002414967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000125545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002361244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976773,0.00007864765,0.0007653373,0.0002675945,0.0009657207,0.0002454369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960118,0.00004740077,0.00150215,0.0002744424,0.002025595,0.000138604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004393281,0.0007083083,0.00008787588,0.000154775,0.00006780359,5.30747e-7,0.0001534837,0.0003219449,0.957145,0.0003967289,0.0001539553,0.0403703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002323933,0.001349216,0.0005152559,0.0003339598,0.0001483786,0.00002854617,0.0000200967,0.008231009,0.9546826,0.03044632,0.00169213,0.0002284992],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6132625,0.00008754455,0.3425092,0.0005376104,0.00005572096,0.0424885,0.00004294665,0.00011902,0.0008970169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982471,0.000009641153,0.07022986,0.00007430506,0.0003568977,0.03101974,0.00002478491,0.0000321354,0.000005587133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2849846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8468506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0327770355212192,"score_gpt":0.3591685217414128,"score_spread":0.3263914862201936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}