{"id":"W2094668194","doi":"10.1016/s1001-0742(11)60779-1","title":"Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for three chlorophenols in surface waters of China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Sciences","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Environmental science; Probabilistic logic; Pentachlorophenol; Joint probability distribution; Risk assessment; Aquatic ecosystem; Joint (building); Probabilistic risk assessment; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002565804,0.0001526724,0.0002892171,0.00004536292,0.0001241707,0.00001954466,0.0004977738,0.00006375339,0.001671807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000169722,0.0001006546,0.00009876447,0.0002042799,0.0008920297,0.0007239609,0.0001619796,0.0001855238,0.00001978171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006074865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002953268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003040056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002699759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979449,0.00009801701,0.0006164802,0.000182847,0.000652943,0.0005048288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988825,0.0001676429,0.0006257618,0.0001255891,7.919691e-7,0.0001976851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003917784,0.0007576871,0.9285302,0.000003275651,0.00001252633,0.000002587953,0.0003819486,0.005279305,0.05187034,0.00001679125,0.00004706459,0.01305905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005933765,0.000975116,0.9929853,0.00001133361,0.00002352581,0.00003311029,0.0001915458,0.0006207291,0.003079544,0.001264069,0.00009464303,0.00012771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982517,0.00006487514,0.0002291405,0.000176641,0.000207153,0.0002986293,0.00004076591,0.000003407571,0.0007277278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938411,0.00003871147,0.00601949,0.00002368271,0.00004589584,0.000001844916,1.660316e-7,0.000007992723,0.000021174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06445505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01579156035105154,"score_gpt":0.2640213137188931,"score_spread":0.2482297533678416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}