{"id":"W2094939070","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/303/1/012014","title":"Effect of Magnetic Film Thickness on the Spatial Resolution of Magnetic Force Microscope Tips","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ryerson University; Chuo University","keywords":"Magnetic force microscope; Materials science; Scanning electron microscope; Magnetometer; Thin film; RADIUS; Resolution (logic); Surface roughness; Optics; Microscope; Magnetic field; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Magnetization; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001063876,0.000757599,0.000515743,0.0004018224,0.0003233579,0.000732399,0.0006853104,0.0007648012,0.002029721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005914903,0.001047132,0.0002476984,0.0002812033,0.0003977208,0.0006641087,0.0004323344,0.0008625059,0.0005293599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002933871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002332197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007769258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009711773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991616,0.0001328838,0.00008800531,0.0002215956,0.0002791532,0.0001166646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947245,0.003258977,0.0005067873,0.0004179104,0.0008992728,0.0001925471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001008424,0.00001059552,0.0002164001,0.00007477334,0.00001114894,0.00008805857,0.00004788315,0.0001894135,0.9976062,0.00004512801,0.00006993116,0.001539637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001949899,0.0001216287,0.002603645,0.00001512491,0.00002642675,0.0001836227,0.00005559738,0.002700416,0.9934757,0.00002881891,0.0007582676,0.00001127203],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674383,0.004215696,0.02132994,0.0004721135,0.000244407,0.00008563648,0.0004044886,0.0008263797,0.004983082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725385,0.001427815,0.0235829,0.0001557126,0.00004557109,0.00007131063,0.0003389679,0.0002175927,0.001621497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002029721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006790102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01497450653234814,"score_gpt":0.2509524382584641,"score_spread":0.2359779317261159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}