{"id":"W2095025293","doi":"10.1353/cat.0.0556","title":"„Quod est in actis, non est in mundo\": Päpstliche Benefizialpolitik im sacrum imperium des 14. Jahrhunderts (review)","year":2009,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"˜The œCatholic historical review","topic":"Historical and Religious Studies of Rome","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Scholarship; Holy See; Politics; German; Schism; SAINT; History; Classics; Art; Art history; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001707303,0.001272278,0.003365649,0.0003288785,0.001454403,0.0001211854,0.001411372,0.0004050733,0.0006458426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005137593,0.0009050702,0.00112334,0.001036733,0.000764816,0.0002726817,0.0003077271,0.001825335,0.002158702],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006642709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003954204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01283519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01022242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922645,0.000692471,0.002705304,0.001283035,0.001026342,0.002028328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964069,0.0004584945,0.0007479666,0.001476478,0.0003133663,0.0005968189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001039999,0.003394999,0.0001469008,0.02653891,0.0002097976,0.0006376364,0.0298581,0.000007945134,0.00002662542,0.01310577,0.6269676,0.2990017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006971695,0.000517005,0.000426284,0.01898588,0.0005889665,0.00004335256,0.0001149654,0.00001163794,7.115779e-7,0.001244646,0.9762695,0.001099864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006477374,0.9261289,0.000008004065,0.01294206,0.00273169,0.002055286,0.0000419679,0.0001058879,0.05533842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04757345,0.9241924,0.00005620902,0.01348395,0.002092104,0.0003399443,0.00003955079,0.0001068668,0.0121155],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02724404929156549,"score_gpt":0.260886107927952,"score_spread":0.2336420586363865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}