{"id":"W2095120395","doi":"10.1088/0967-3334/25/1/028","title":"Accounting for erroneous electrode data in electrical impedance tomography","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiological Measurement","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Electrical impedance tomography; Noise (video); A priori and a posteriori; Electrode; Electrical impedance; Tomography; Iterative reconstruction; Finite element method; Electrical resistivity tomography; Image (mathematics); Acoustics; Mathematics; Electrical resistivity and conductivity; Physics; Computer science; Optics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003301021,0.0007800478,0.0008750231,0.0009551338,0.0003580494,0.001112616,0.001256581,0.001567807,0.0005069086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02490618,0.000909037,0.0005197171,0.001281715,0.001357524,0.002591729,0.001529193,0.001300118,0.0003646038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005241988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006810085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001122558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00141172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976749,0.0007663881,0.000167522,0.0002774455,0.001026698,0.0000869556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903661,0.006253786,0.001023327,0.001487034,0.0007687807,0.000100909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007218011,0.00008393502,0.01070076,0.000594347,0.0001473443,0.002143298,0.001033848,0.5741334,0.1323863,0.02398107,0.0009934391,0.2530805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160529,0.0001366189,0.004234258,0.00005678009,0.00006206005,0.00163025,0.0001179161,0.8545451,0.1109578,0.02439388,0.00374585,0.00008799021],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02622856,0.0002059807,0.972937,0.000124691,0.00003276281,0.00001075992,0.00002703418,0.0002719042,0.0001614005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.446531,0.0008428176,0.5507323,0.0001484223,0.00007292093,0.00006363626,0.0002104168,0.0002769788,0.001121584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003301021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01745772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06036240697403062,"score_gpt":0.2564956743274512,"score_spread":0.1961332673534206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}