{"id":"W2095144920","doi":"10.1139/x00-142","title":"An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Remote sensing; Thematic Mapper; Lidar; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Basal area; Vegetation (pathology); Thematic map; Forest structure; Canopy; Forestry; Forest management; Cartography; Satellite imagery; Geography; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003119012,0.0005277586,0.0002271462,0.0008957611,0.000289847,0.0007374352,0.0005770213,0.0002697133,0.0006211181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642835,0.0002265814,0.0003049873,0.0006707368,0.0002442864,0.001050633,0.0003560729,0.0002037793,0.0001548685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008033549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000518553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02407205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05756979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987524,0.0003678402,0.0001001925,0.000200855,0.0005228009,0.00005586923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973863,0.00105528,0.0003442359,0.0002301261,0.0008513025,0.0001328425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001329089,0.0007680993,0.85291,0.0001519399,0.000145673,0.000190035,0.0003011443,0.00993323,0.01713166,0.0002912681,0.0005134298,0.1163344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001874154,0.001949032,0.8506683,0.00005152974,0.0001714754,0.0002492354,0.0007128061,0.1270446,0.01588261,0.000168067,0.002869288,0.00004561191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948085,0.000077766,0.00302958,0.00003906857,0.000005039532,0.00009329677,0.000790001,0.000105582,0.001051277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713968,0.0001339974,0.02479812,0.00002593202,0.000009801967,0.00008708224,0.002922531,0.00002555544,0.0006001138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02407205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0478639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09913936910423937,"score_gpt":0.3623249762104074,"score_spread":0.2631856071061681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}