{"id":"W2095144920","doi":"10.1139/x00-142","title":"An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Remote sensing; Thematic Mapper; Lidar; Environmental science; Forest inventory; Basal area; Vegetation (pathology); Thematic map; Forest structure; Canopy; Forestry; Forest management; Cartography; Satellite imagery; Geography; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003860632,0.0000952925,0.0002004318,0.000509343,0.0001325872,0.00004528643,0.0002560467,0.00006950243,0.000005719068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000437796,0.00009443315,0.00003938664,0.0005316578,0.0003386017,0.0002342377,0.00002743832,0.0002456226,0.000001758077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004128783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004420271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03997163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3295106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980422,0.0002097828,0.0004523891,0.0002101763,0.0006793702,0.0004060508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986358,0.00008036333,0.0002402985,0.0003000462,0.0004151732,0.0003282951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003882299,0.00001746198,0.9188524,0.00003616633,0.00001061387,0.00001506565,0.001166173,0.005436033,0.00565281,0.00002184139,0.00008242166,0.06867015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007013642,0.0002394363,0.9636747,0.0003102665,0.00001409267,0.0001022712,0.0002975677,0.02688636,0.00202017,0.004274344,0.001385048,0.00009435638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980776,0.0001635227,0.0004796721,0.0003284735,0.00014242,0.0004781974,0.000002847722,0.000001903127,0.0003253096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971119,0.00003522971,0.002580566,0.000003328441,0.0002018067,6.450436e-7,0.000003143134,0.00001778255,0.00004561952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.289539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09913936910423937,"score_gpt":0.3623249762104074,"score_spread":0.2631856071061681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}