{"id":"W2095189374","doi":"10.2166/wst.2011.091","title":"Evaluation of biofilm performance as a protective barrier against biocorrosion using an enzyme electrode","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Texas A and M University","keywords":"Biofilm; Sulfide; Chemistry; Microbiology; Escherichia coli; Wastewater; Amperometry; Bacteria; Electrode; Environmental engineering; Biology; Environmental science; Electrochemistry; Biochemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002862125,0.0001573831,0.0001737534,0.0009198381,0.0004102727,0.00003691504,0.0005994774,0.000165479,0.0003693414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010043,0.0001145244,0.00003152066,0.001034792,0.001136088,0.001088555,0.0002225294,0.000143918,0.00008820856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002403607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000328559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007758202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001094541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976166,0.00009708834,0.0003111336,0.0005905755,0.000856721,0.0005278837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983726,0.000002487049,0.0001375818,0.0005485966,0.0008609928,0.00007780148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002426144,0.00009764614,0.0003581319,0.000003828044,1.750099e-7,7.581812e-7,0.0009605649,0.00005693921,0.9940571,0.00007753795,5.966612e-7,0.004362511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002448121,0.0007166173,0.0002078906,0.00003415304,0.0000269535,0.00003008796,0.0002694823,0.01068305,0.9861442,0.001465427,0.000008027322,0.0001692691],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963358,0.00001742764,0.002268916,0.00002247472,0.0002578714,0.000599109,0.000004008887,0.0001620534,0.0003323268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984676,0.000003267897,0.001367191,0.00002601325,0.00001453855,0.00009789779,0.000002366625,0.00001138281,0.000009744054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01062611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4670171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05410007128381,"score_gpt":0.292469471718326,"score_spread":0.238369400434516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}