{"id":"W2095237287","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.015","title":"Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Set (abstract data type); Status quo; Computer science; Mathematics; Aggregation problem; Relation (database); Economics; Data mining; Statistics; Voting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008472099,0.0009915588,0.001953391,0.002679897,0.003239342,0.008867981,0.003029563,0.003000428,0.007039639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03440392,0.001064554,0.002645327,0.0042739,0.00462068,0.01296365,0.00368185,0.003979708,0.0008529222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001890715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00209397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001644168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001258099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905991,0.003927293,0.0009681811,0.001497626,0.001585186,0.001422607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657472,0.02147896,0.003240832,0.004855887,0.0030356,0.001641437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004026154,0.00005529635,0.0004792253,0.00004055163,0.00002276446,0.00004997925,0.0003288407,0.001726341,0.0003133609,0.9919469,0.0006626387,0.004333868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002433356,0.00001511107,0.0001901175,0.0000107112,0.0000124319,0.00005278442,0.0001180198,0.01581137,0.0001656216,0.9830791,0.0005073728,0.00001301228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2405409,0.0005841476,0.7202728,0.002786066,0.00008353006,0.0003051355,0.0008810686,0.0002913932,0.03425495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943164,0.000431262,0.05036131,0.0003692118,0.0001671215,0.0003568119,0.0006751216,0.00007647843,0.004398732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008867981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04480529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04966057064621966,"score_gpt":0.2229314150855681,"score_spread":0.1732708444393485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}