{"id":"W2095296046","doi":"10.1116/1.3698602","title":"Secondary electron deposition mechanism of carbon contamination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research","funders":"","keywords":"Deposition (geology); Carbon fibers; Electron beam-induced deposition; Materials science; Fluence; Transmission electron microscopy; Ionization; Contamination; Scanning electron microscope; Absorption (acoustics); Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Scanning transmission electron microscopy; Nanotechnology; Environmental chemistry; Composite material; Ion; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004084064,0.0002836652,0.0005934482,0.001380505,0.0003754856,0.00008105117,0.0005053175,0.0003760946,0.00001237868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010556,0.0002449393,0.00003446481,0.0008353778,0.001077256,0.0007014982,0.0001484054,0.0004706136,6.177711e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003608323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005983355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006856107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006422491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974189,0.00007686721,0.0007760203,0.0003472139,0.0004846931,0.0008963494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979983,0.00001589458,0.001065634,0.0002158263,0.0006096267,0.0000947243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001054069,0.0001218985,0.0001161887,0.00008485211,0.00001577387,0.000001266563,0.0001927824,7.77131e-8,0.9634278,0.02769434,0.000003201983,0.008236423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005607663,0.001551861,0.0001003729,0.0001369926,0.00009007457,0.00041103,0.0001485208,0.00000799905,0.976669,0.01997809,0.0001213988,0.0002239358],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794247,0.01540627,0.003818116,0.0006607789,0.0002359171,0.0002450748,0.000002359583,0.000129036,0.00007780048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953081,0.001167738,0.003365292,0.00004842265,0.00006594323,0.00001596919,8.063195e-7,0.00002061339,0.000007125258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01588345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009599745433228299,"score_gpt":0.2418784058557171,"score_spread":0.2322786604224888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}