{"id":"W2095319092","doi":"10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.55","title":"A comparative analysis of two building rating systems Part 1: Evaluation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Green building; Architectural engineering; Rating system; Process (computing); Environmental design; Energy consumption; Environmental economics; Environmental impact assessment; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Civil engineering; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05682492,0.0008267754,0.001512892,0.006466984,0.0006746301,0.003599802,0.00100312,0.0009200086,0.004765465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1086895,0.0003661369,0.001452964,0.007591048,0.001115245,0.003400073,0.001524765,0.0008052299,0.0009630742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004024842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001469638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003161852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003805121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9124023,0.05487335,0.004215512,0.00151297,0.02572846,0.001267341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8169581,0.1264686,0.005930261,0.006697912,0.04253276,0.001412224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009365001,0.001182047,0.1287989,0.003999408,0.001392149,0.0001438831,0.003386626,0.0458209,0.006272033,0.01834689,0.01007855,0.7712137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008308152,0.02310171,0.6785643,0.001863354,0.002479452,0.0005820471,0.00791647,0.1983821,0.02348456,0.01353877,0.04853596,0.000720441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7664541,0.007485177,0.1097391,0.0009516154,0.0003587667,0.003296011,0.002427214,0.0007635806,0.1085244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597145,0.0009347636,0.03296056,0.000075621,0.00005455791,0.0007511521,0.001483502,0.000110248,0.003915097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05682492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3005225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01845796015077288,"score_gpt":0.2659543889361194,"score_spread":0.2474964287853466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}