{"id":"W2095319092","doi":"10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.55","title":"A comparative analysis of two building rating systems Part 1: Evaluation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Green building; Architectural engineering; Rating system; Process (computing); Environmental design; Energy consumption; Environmental economics; Environmental impact assessment; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Civil engineering; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001396015,0.0003125382,0.0008382902,0.0007115109,0.0001005072,0.00001863251,0.0003872376,0.0001056017,0.000007620018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007883827,0.00028582,0.000321401,0.002606259,0.0002050286,0.0003975572,0.00007478863,0.0002547521,9.101777e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009381457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007664638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002884205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976151,0.00002197621,0.000939057,0.0002734595,0.0007765017,0.0003739254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973444,0.0001481866,0.000326987,0.0002761435,0.001823381,0.00008086047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123286,0.00005783085,0.004117459,0.001467017,0.0006725057,4.408989e-7,0.001146215,0.9613246,0.01337946,0.01769469,0.00007724111,0.0000501931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005193709,0.00004337828,0.006611148,0.0002158582,0.0007381926,0.000005655517,0.001444185,0.9559555,0.03383305,0.0001709557,0.0001922861,0.0002703997],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614542,0.0005785522,0.03559529,0.00001631686,0.0004159698,0.0009392287,0.00001437605,0.0001886367,0.0007974923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986679,0.00001940645,0.001116573,0.000001126793,0.00004700396,0.0001078529,0.000004320316,0.00002046834,0.00001535267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03721375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01845796015077288,"score_gpt":0.2659543889361194,"score_spread":0.2474964287853466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}