{"id":"W2095355588","doi":"10.1063/1.4871627","title":"Hardness of FeB4: Density functional theory investigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Materials science; Orthorhombic crystal system; Vickers hardness test; Density functional theory; Ultimate tensile strength; Covalent bond; Condensed matter physics; Shear (geology); Crystallography; Composite material; Computational chemistry; Microstructure; Chemistry; Crystal structure; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006801536,0.0007905,0.000938805,0.001447314,0.001238669,0.0007943413,0.001669329,0.001449746,0.004826395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008796083,0.0004145445,0.0010105,0.0006469381,0.0009087593,0.00078876,0.000899084,0.0008815852,0.0003984411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008941874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006414698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005868659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005228908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997028,0.00005899398,0.000007019777,0.00002224931,0.0001146403,0.00009432607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996905,0.0001217586,0.0000241611,0.00004655736,0.00008289494,0.00003405842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004907784,0.0005874431,0.009747319,0.002116131,0.0004579392,0.002196428,0.0005320825,0.550259,0.0243815,0.3723182,0.01416358,0.02274958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006421129,0.00006026659,0.002137274,0.00003713891,0.00002270494,0.00009565977,0.0001179123,0.9744331,0.0009911438,0.02079964,0.001209288,0.00003176241],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.91829,0.00222691,0.02383888,0.001887192,0.0002147909,0.0001195542,0.00114949,0.0002646972,0.05200842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884464,0.0008300591,0.006271994,0.000365044,0.00007902677,0.0001796363,0.001065127,0.00006461822,0.002698172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005868659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01614588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02247709582944547,"score_gpt":0.2415220106202492,"score_spread":0.2190449147908037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}