{"id":"W2095370543","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2007.02.015","title":"Wind force coefficients for designing free-standing canopy roofs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Western University","funders":"Concordia University; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Roof; Wind engineering; Wind direction; Structural engineering; Wind profile power law; Wind force; Wind speed; Environmental science; Geology; Meteorology; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003095619,0.0005516893,0.0004186903,0.0004484966,0.0004141015,0.0005192328,0.0006316903,0.0005089049,0.002163485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001135813,0.0003492967,0.0004275526,0.0002326039,0.0001756605,0.0004341172,0.0002593313,0.000420811,0.0004557823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002522694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000607295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002087889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005119752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998611,0.00002050814,0.000006073118,0.00001098468,0.00008115303,0.00002009504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999737,0.0000951192,0.00002897278,0.00001679226,0.0001079529,0.000014145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008668237,0.0001426038,0.002312181,0.0003111952,0.00002562394,0.0001977933,0.0001278702,0.8130082,0.07482036,0.007051523,0.001682215,0.1002336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003115074,0.0001641518,0.001813957,0.00005743513,0.00003124207,0.00009556035,0.0001433631,0.9759413,0.01860754,0.0007867642,0.002308561,0.00001893748],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2539114,0.0004518549,0.7235115,0.00009675255,0.00006741012,0.0001880942,0.0001651368,0.0003315847,0.02127625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8912744,0.0002973706,0.1058026,0.00001783865,0.00001241229,0.0001302063,0.0001369013,0.0001030042,0.002225168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002163485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007237613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01661463047100735,"score_gpt":0.2161421994231855,"score_spread":0.1995275689521781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}