{"id":"W2095543445","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2003.08.022","title":"An examination of at-home food preparation activity among low-income, food-insecure women","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Dietetic Association","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental health; Food preparation; Vulnerability (computing); Food insecurity; Food security; Consumption (sociology); Low income; Food consumption; Medicine; Food science; Business; Food processing; Socioeconomics; Geography; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Economics; Sociology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003020438,0.0001431024,0.0004805404,0.0001753114,0.0007190252,0.00001216142,0.000247939,0.000159715,0.00008292176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001572963,0.0001174727,0.0001478977,0.0005787838,0.00009284933,0.0004479123,0.00004913874,0.0006115885,0.000008768531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002685327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003406059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004843826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005730197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951576,0.002629994,0.0008961077,0.0001511185,0.0007688497,0.0003963524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924822,0.0006410501,0.005711712,0.0003044169,0.0007015288,0.0001590383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003269207,0.0005855961,0.9571096,0.0002523807,0.0002815867,4.588273e-7,0.03655911,0.0007458807,0.00129684,0.001018632,0.0008019738,0.001020976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007338762,0.002098591,0.990464,0.0001517979,0.00007006709,8.978752e-7,0.004350763,0.0003488777,0.0003302583,0.001016909,0.0003158061,0.0001181305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973243,0.00002934217,0.0001424331,0.0005299867,0.0006923872,0.0004704233,0.0000402973,0.00001927385,0.0007515769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991606,0.00005273902,0.0002062962,0.0001500877,0.0001612768,0.00002722043,0.000003466058,0.00001868989,0.0002196027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03335438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7022036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04350065241550254,"score_gpt":0.383463119626786,"score_spread":0.3399624672112834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}