{"id":"W2095551648","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00469.x","title":"Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Respondent; Status quo; Choice set; Preference; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Task (project management); Status quo bias; Function (biology); Economics; Order (exchange); Econometrics; Psychology; Public economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002758857,0.0001127643,0.0002864694,0.0000563473,0.0001002827,0.00003473406,0.0001448569,0.00005702141,0.00001557336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004930124,0.00008203485,0.00009055617,0.00004662873,0.00008958662,0.0002394579,0.00002587686,0.0001141067,8.376153e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002001127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007121055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001224343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007119388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989705,0.00001587877,0.0006496283,0.0001612496,0.00002093139,0.0001818189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.00002987959,0.0007396773,0.00009090723,0.00002959668,0.00008916588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003757136,0.0001728704,0.9623446,0.00002742047,0.0001324649,8.901984e-8,0.001484335,0.002557598,0.0007676407,0.02902407,0.0008491155,0.002602186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009231034,0.0001227824,0.987661,0.00002174105,0.00001087112,0.00000839783,0.000682253,0.00002078201,0.0003289421,0.004170102,0.005941271,0.000108776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914358,0.000600405,0.00001342746,0.007218343,0.00008758412,0.0002060503,0.00008583875,0.000001547774,0.000351011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991413,0.0002645958,0.0002688976,0.000106821,0.00009230393,0.000003952106,0.000005801802,0.000004407395,0.0001119407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02531634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3345284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1993201830507977,"score_gpt":0.2727111289171409,"score_spread":0.0733909458663432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}