{"id":"W2095612437","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgl006","title":"A retail sampling approach to assess impact of geographic concentrations on probative value of comparative bullet lead analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; Ryerson University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Public domain; Law; Statistics; Business; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1281668,0.001244636,0.001677293,0.006645877,0.002614071,0.002645446,0.003889897,0.002571461,0.004275884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3399184,0.0008184022,0.00194029,0.008097712,0.004713206,0.003030655,0.005007425,0.00277071,0.0007758178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001777175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001770044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00764136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004763932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7646993,0.1706194,0.01012617,0.01551445,0.03676056,0.002280209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6233348,0.2905453,0.02830495,0.03425387,0.02219294,0.001368112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002620124,0.001376897,0.671115,0.001755627,0.004354464,0.001628776,0.01535922,0.01181193,0.006215443,0.09100651,0.01002765,0.1827283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007533896,0.01785186,0.6216034,0.001088051,0.002123097,0.003211451,0.0137139,0.1586393,0.02243084,0.07924451,0.07878593,0.0005541915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2917865,0.001085227,0.6616789,0.0008609255,0.0005540144,0.01202185,0.002272947,0.0005047744,0.02923488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7396291,0.0002275922,0.2448938,0.0007582563,0.0002042012,0.01075228,0.001005739,0.0001436932,0.002385392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1281668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6778188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05699373531188846,"score_gpt":0.3014105985818857,"score_spread":0.2444168632699972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}