{"id":"W2095706371","doi":"10.1111/1097-3923.00045","title":"Optimal Income Taxation With Quasi‐Linear Preferences Revisited","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Incentive; Distribution (mathematics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Microeconomics; Order (exchange); Income tax; Econometrics; Range (aeronautics); Participation constraint; Public economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00259524,0.000206749,0.000647341,0.0004319336,0.0001049724,0.0001516863,0.0004950547,0.0001293335,0.005586916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009614941,0.0001899127,0.0001915459,0.0001180974,0.0001404388,0.001296199,0.00002936823,0.0003038521,0.001208959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002531316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009833125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003097675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009626473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979377,0.00008208736,0.001306071,0.0002834577,0.00003176996,0.0003588485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974785,0.0001390623,0.001832984,0.0002998193,0.00003825063,0.0002113879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003657442,0.0001850511,0.06202251,0.0000412662,0.0004042954,0.00000839414,0.0007866404,0.001472335,0.000003334058,0.9204816,0.001205185,0.01302369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00467783,0.001655199,0.1100066,0.0001287402,0.00005833192,0.0004025108,0.0008464427,0.005953426,0.00009588565,0.7635085,0.1114816,0.001184944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9202283,0.0006760427,0.001525746,0.0008360776,0.0002220678,0.0001016438,0.00008114397,0.00002117418,0.0763078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962761,0.0001736115,0.001196157,0.0002904448,0.000721204,0.000004817281,0.00000888917,0.00003085199,0.001297913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.156973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02929206696897899,"score_gpt":0.2236620914020803,"score_spread":0.1943700244331013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}