{"id":"W2095773283","doi":"10.1897/ieam_2007-017.1","title":"Design and application of a transparent and scalable weight-of-evidence framework: An example from Wabamun Lake, Alberta, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Ecosystem; Variety (cybernetics); Judgement; Process (computing); Aquatic ecosystem; Computer science; Scalability; Ranking (information retrieval); A priori and a posteriori; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Biology; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1621553,0.001488098,0.002095444,0.009637488,0.004903923,0.009226411,0.003731066,0.003723596,0.003626531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.182651,0.001642786,0.002555991,0.007278385,0.003012696,0.003851552,0.005891448,0.002663222,0.0002917267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03111796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06441256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1796622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.317865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8554623,0.106631,0.01264195,0.003766028,0.01847978,0.003019038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8148081,0.1264769,0.007880335,0.004998513,0.04261336,0.00322268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002212187,0.001127377,0.01922058,0.01553586,0.002918964,0.00518929,0.02061521,0.2194775,0.009387244,0.1987935,0.01691922,0.4886031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005974359,0.003288065,0.02472105,0.01394969,0.004692321,0.001696381,0.01903939,0.5366768,0.01306894,0.2275986,0.1482799,0.001014534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09324344,0.00273655,0.8027139,0.01498031,0.0001733435,0.04915448,0.00266879,0.0006108474,0.03371828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118582,0.0004381263,0.8730206,0.0003557637,0.0000189887,0.006520594,0.0002609553,0.00003301335,0.0007699692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8575693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03766531294021831,"score_gpt":0.2820551310985933,"score_spread":0.244389818158375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}