{"id":"W2095981310","doi":"10.1139/z03-022","title":"Using patch and landscape variables to model bird abundance in a naturally heterogeneous landscape","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Minnesota Duluth","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Relative species abundance; Ecology; Landscape ecology; Regression analysis; Linear regression; Physical geography; Biology; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003750431,0.00008080853,0.0002524366,0.0003163816,0.00004671128,0.00002570368,0.00008703922,0.00008675527,0.0002039631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006343347,0.00009409589,0.00003233681,0.00007587612,0.00002787911,0.0001120052,0.000007055617,0.0001138445,0.00002757586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001394217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001154024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002310447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03238604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992104,0.00001818341,0.000390448,0.0001431359,0.00001166562,0.0002261822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995002,0.00001888656,0.0001714794,0.00008002058,0.00001015418,0.0002192177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005682304,0.000005887935,0.9288285,0.000003722268,0.00001400069,0.00002372405,0.0003384663,0.06564216,0.00002265639,0.004926843,0.00005776725,0.0001306092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003337225,0.0004594349,0.6429579,0.00008035857,0.00003063798,0.001682887,0.0005720216,0.2596368,0.000101474,0.08627816,0.003954108,0.0009089724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934832,0.00275667,0.002089193,0.0002024309,0.0002154379,0.00005519637,0.00001680196,0.000001572028,0.001179439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995479,0.00009169547,0.003851565,0.0004724694,0.00002655827,0.000001244482,7.852281e-7,0.00001444976,0.00006219449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2858706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06413777431387846,"score_gpt":0.2116468869489851,"score_spread":0.1475091126351067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}