{"id":"W2096119600","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0024-y","title":"Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Data Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Inequality; Publishing; Citation impact; Productivity; Publication; Gini coefficient; Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Economic inequality; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Library science; Economic growth; Law; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1603896,0.0001677889,0.0004807424,0.05371875,0.0006870691,0.003284267,0.009054329,0.00003986023,0.00009091958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1493065,0.0001069772,0.00002895507,0.2619271,0.002896502,0.008303492,0.006815976,0.0003223284,0.00001422702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001880447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009488858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008801027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001102828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804884,0.0005360763,0.001096401,0.00180948,0.01516057,0.0009090835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853236,0.005524646,0.0006320153,0.003646765,0.00392879,0.0009442047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002035494,0.0004880532,0.8842402,0.000003896283,0.00000353154,0.0002263047,0.003059675,0.0002493217,0.00381139,0.0002883776,0.0001010716,0.1075078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001037353,0.0008376995,0.9041589,0.00001876285,0.000004920641,0.0002541326,0.02109385,0.07000024,0.0006176772,0.001650482,0.00009823749,0.0002276722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996446,0.0001376933,0.002262978,0.00009413411,0.0002293945,0.0003469453,0.0001690401,0.000007309155,0.0003065313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988333,0.00002785724,0.001059201,0.00002604977,0.00002466821,0.000002531005,0.000001221023,0.000004237484,0.00002096441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2082084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7717071333746156,"score_gpt":0.6827132583531631,"score_spread":0.0889938750214525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}