{"id":"W2096119600","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0024-y","title":"Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Data Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Inequality; Publishing; Citation impact; Productivity; Publication; Gini coefficient; Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Economic inequality; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Library science; Economic growth; Law; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008969846,0.0002916277,0.0008654865,0.005907256,0.002234359,0.002817765,0.001205281,0.001303737,0.001568906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0458582,0.0002429763,0.0009889078,0.01235551,0.002117838,0.00283117,0.002328971,0.001200038,0.0002443337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001298597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001013589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01205444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939674,0.003427177,0.000389384,0.0005326743,0.0009772278,0.0007061258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8924592,0.08647076,0.01155397,0.003909389,0.003355436,0.002251192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000371592,0.0004383492,0.9560044,0.0001808315,0.0002445796,0.003742492,0.009654868,0.005707019,0.000719998,0.007444176,0.0006373206,0.01485442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007895889,0.0002695918,0.9272118,0.0001341153,0.0001725832,0.003511527,0.01726845,0.03243839,0.001457723,0.01323732,0.004131426,0.00008814374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975848,0.0002902056,0.000986309,0.0002351517,0.000003152953,0.00001277905,0.0001372337,0.000005026765,0.0007452737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987128,0.0001424866,0.0007695048,0.00002224221,0.00001785981,0.00001144237,0.0001690881,0.000005266588,0.0001492571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04743761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7717071333746156,"score_gpt":0.6827132583531631,"score_spread":0.0889938750214525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}