{"id":"W2096134531","doi":"10.1177/1468798404041458","title":"Drawings as an Alternative Way of Understanding Young Children’s Constructions of Literacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","topic":"Art Education and Development","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Drama; Representation (politics); Privilege (computing); Pedagogy; Psychology; Subject matter; Perception; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics education; Politics; Linguistics; Visual arts; Curriculum; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002298802,0.000165993,0.0003381698,0.0004420647,0.0002320166,0.0002263248,0.0002336487,0.0000363117,0.0007435927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006159242,0.0001388196,0.0001867623,0.000104771,0.0002249318,0.00187486,0.00003240918,0.0002586982,0.00001114434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001327742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003277595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001993273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009581165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983212,0.00005176119,0.0009181807,0.0001400897,0.0003897058,0.0001790793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979843,0.00005920031,0.001015671,0.0001629025,0.0006312896,0.0001466444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006066186,0.000603849,0.01320133,0.00001272237,0.0002554092,0.0000062708,0.7527387,0.00003056422,0.00004346653,0.2310524,0.0001178446,0.001876717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007756637,0.003101259,0.6012736,0.002617309,0.0003315051,0.001152148,0.06150842,0.00000440806,0.004056288,0.3111795,0.006018442,0.00100045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910121,0.0001587087,0.0003846755,0.0003658483,0.0009772643,0.0001265667,0.00002668548,0.00001167305,0.006936511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968885,0.00003193492,0.001941006,0.0001579576,0.000601829,0.000001364804,0.000009417107,0.00001885582,0.0003491515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8141819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01863281222138658,"score_gpt":0.2663577802744896,"score_spread":0.247724968053103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}