{"id":"W2096146674","doi":"10.1029/2006gl026614","title":"Anomalous pelagic nekton abundance, distribution, and apparent recruitment in the northern California Current in 2004 and 2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; National Marine Fisheries Service; Bonneville Power Administration","keywords":"Nekton; Pelagic zone; Upwelling; Productivity; Oceanography; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Population; Environmental science; Juvenile; Ecology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002950002,0.0001152843,0.0001680006,0.0006023002,0.0006044852,0.0006026524,0.0002127739,0.0002527134,0.0006082997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000826612,0.0001813069,0.00009987925,0.0003926074,0.0002417082,0.0003060475,0.000305988,0.0002369927,0.00007046092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001104632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005056469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1343115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4588356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998845,0.000009567983,0.00001207116,0.00003647517,0.00002644646,0.00003092001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993315,0.00004599921,0.0002919103,0.00002567959,0.0001380883,0.0001669061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001098212,0.00002969729,0.9956788,0.000009829676,0.00002449914,0.0001014406,0.0003126289,0.0001066737,0.0005047403,0.00002526142,0.0003956476,0.002700926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.839386e-7,0.000006838216,0.9996395,0.000002173144,0.00000324759,0.00002780734,0.0001189971,0.00004180005,0.00002005582,0.000004420726,0.0001330803,0.000001101943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994118,0.00008218396,0.0000103456,0.00002209042,0.000002804933,0.000001199536,0.0001118467,0.000001847124,0.0003557985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990417,0.00009057656,0.0000533648,0.00002058778,0.000003058694,0.000002580965,0.0003440773,0.000001226677,0.0004427615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1343115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2670594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03075962114477976,"score_gpt":0.2980133830689071,"score_spread":0.2672537619241273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}