{"id":"W2096146674","doi":"10.1029/2006gl026614","title":"Anomalous pelagic nekton abundance, distribution, and apparent recruitment in the northern California Current in 2004 and 2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Research Letters","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; National Marine Fisheries Service; Bonneville Power Administration","keywords":"Nekton; Pelagic zone; Upwelling; Productivity; Oceanography; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Population; Environmental science; Juvenile; Ecology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008801902,0.0001330895,0.0001449647,0.00005946807,0.0001711896,0.0001161097,0.0002776488,0.00003603617,0.0001619295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000588363,0.00009592574,0.00002638832,0.0005339321,0.0006856947,0.0001215043,0.0003907756,0.0006354261,0.0001152434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003453134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002087612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01244778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008557392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973751,0.0003340793,0.0002074341,0.0004184592,0.0008689102,0.0007960619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994115,0.0001899516,0.00002267584,0.0002482475,0.00001174362,0.000115889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008661007,0.0004487049,0.9018282,0.00003205972,0.000002922701,0.00008220717,0.0003063552,0.00008556747,0.0007242926,0.0001838518,0.01519443,0.08102479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004484511,0.00007481928,0.7918473,0.00001230514,0.00000146773,0.000003498672,0.00009757648,0.0009220886,0.0000158396,0.001031568,0.2054155,0.00012961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902064,0.0001183303,0.0000373138,0.006763376,0.00001767132,0.0007126362,0.00003058565,0.000007048003,0.00210666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991532,0.0001409098,0.00001286537,0.0001519749,0.00009221917,0.0002242506,0.00006399,0.000008690151,0.000151905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1902211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03075962114477976,"score_gpt":0.2980133830689071,"score_spread":0.2672537619241273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}