{"id":"W2096161461","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00264.x","title":"Wildlife trade and endangered species protection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Poaching; Endangered species; Wildlife; Enforcement; Business; CITES; Incentive; Natural resource economics; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife trade; International trade; Fishery; Ecology; Economics; Microeconomics; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002564025,0.0001355374,0.0002970734,0.00007875158,0.0001041888,0.0000848728,0.00008200103,0.00009892333,0.00004772437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001252481,0.0001108918,0.00008825103,0.00003837442,0.0001016701,0.0003803755,0.00002404858,0.00017994,0.0000195467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001437933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006194207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002943378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008401152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.000009056554,0.0005770712,0.0001781243,0.00001825856,0.0001571644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992626,0.000009747292,0.0005287142,0.0000612165,0.000005658585,0.0001320047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000461878,0.0009421858,0.652146,0.000409159,0.001923063,0.00003979083,0.02604859,0.06196513,0.009176235,0.2079418,0.01463757,0.02430853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009584263,0.0002064983,0.9716264,0.00002353343,0.00001429386,0.0003140686,0.001343378,0.000005380908,0.0005829121,0.003859284,0.0208733,0.0001925044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989774,0.0004153308,0.00003972171,0.008829132,0.0001400653,0.0001088462,0.00002210067,0.000005841363,0.0006649807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975666,0.0007713705,0.0003944033,0.0001576242,0.0002757943,0.000002041915,0.000005404449,0.000008320525,0.0008184542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3194804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4522038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06695802101182279,"score_gpt":0.1832476382518753,"score_spread":0.1162896172400526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}