{"id":"W2096221952","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-459x.2001.tb00321.x","title":"A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF A TRAINED SENSORY PANEL<sup>1</sup>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sensory Studies","topic":"Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Sensory analysis; Reliability (semiconductor); Statistics; Sensory system; Conjunction (astronomy); Aroma; Quality (philosophy); Cluster (spacecraft); Computer science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Food science; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02168229,0.0009978091,0.0006832155,0.003760255,0.0005673114,0.001124872,0.0009632867,0.0007899759,0.001937962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0367083,0.0004520913,0.0007568255,0.001992414,0.0005588689,0.0006669705,0.0007262352,0.0005642276,0.0009585667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005330286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005889115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00158521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003685956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789367,0.01171933,0.001084971,0.001587691,0.006374756,0.0002966675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387966,0.04151019,0.002390384,0.002649788,0.01411856,0.0005344448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005167474,0.0009347975,0.06047829,0.002081807,0.000919988,0.0001483746,0.002236933,0.009484816,0.1352414,0.001366466,0.003222,0.7787176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006712583,0.01481955,0.4418361,0.0006891981,0.001380033,0.001748934,0.003511746,0.2718325,0.2421008,0.006077007,0.01434462,0.0009883207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4246331,0.002634073,0.5622884,0.0002304054,0.0002577971,0.001588022,0.0009171815,0.00155213,0.005898902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4407755,0.001009876,0.5532635,0.00007622413,0.00005956416,0.001501048,0.0007343049,0.0002779879,0.002301875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02168229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1146683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4628711006252526,"score_gpt":0.5098913916782787,"score_spread":0.04702029105302608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}