{"id":"W2096290690","doi":"10.1504/ijw.2014.060961","title":"Stream closure and water allocation in the Colombian Andes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Water","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Livelihood; Water scarcity; Distribution (mathematics); STREAMS; Scarcity; Equity (law); Water resource management; Water resources; Land use; Water use; Natural resource economics; Closure (psychology); Agriculture; Business; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004745158,0.0002273705,0.0003323621,0.0009825854,0.001129421,0.002065992,0.00053185,0.0004619472,0.003860823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002666763,0.0001328822,0.0002008427,0.001494045,0.001331134,0.0007761812,0.001286801,0.000397035,0.0001174502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008885684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002411452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.389506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5435553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993827,0.0001874531,0.00002235609,0.0000816477,0.00008548955,0.0002402315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992201,0.0002468696,0.0002199168,0.00002999378,0.0001613566,0.000121669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001668071,0.0006205737,0.5436624,0.001455451,0.0002053641,0.005764104,0.015863,0.09711494,0.00696841,0.0964409,0.0135107,0.2167261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490835,0.0002339772,0.7980453,0.0003638274,0.0001087426,0.0006050039,0.04952355,0.05300399,0.001641868,0.01456234,0.08161753,0.0001447234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641933,0.00156547,0.001201017,0.001145467,0.00001936092,0.00008468221,0.0005514741,0.00002844507,0.0312108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962495,0.0004268631,0.0004631889,0.00002734642,0.000004636599,0.00002241419,0.00009719154,0.000006052797,0.002702849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.389506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7744777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005320242376215894,"score_gpt":0.1941211004928868,"score_spread":0.1888008581166709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}