{"id":"W2096348817","doi":"10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.05.031","title":"Valuation bases for generalized algebraic series fields","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Algebra","topic":"Rings, Modules, and Algebras","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Algebraically closed field; Abelian group; Valuation (finance); Algebraic number; Power series; Discrete valuation; Exponential function; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Function field; Discrete mathematics; Residue field; Field (mathematics); Brauer group; Algebra over a field; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001264105,0.0006310735,0.001085349,0.001911343,0.001203046,0.002963461,0.0009375317,0.000426292,0.005000472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001407837,0.0003285658,0.0005360165,0.001268267,0.002259259,0.003457168,0.001686643,0.001958496,0.000641675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00107681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006803569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005306319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008107264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995999,0.00009869981,0.00002106306,0.00005345071,0.0001327785,0.00009417876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993345,0.0001640451,0.00008678443,0.00008205731,0.0001402112,0.0001923794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003969453,0.00003308489,0.0001994104,0.00002701794,0.000008730938,0.00005914427,0.0002016527,0.0006650597,0.001110985,0.98833,0.0006485174,0.008676703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000276086,0.00002750933,0.0002080364,0.00001597618,0.00001067088,0.0000625556,0.0001105017,0.002611262,0.0004252899,0.9934679,0.003023218,0.000009613268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7526547,0.003190516,0.1190409,0.002124629,0.0007688993,0.000110863,0.0004195018,0.0003827997,0.1213072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965234,0.001164173,0.0157673,0.0002226699,0.000622744,0.0000511897,0.0002718137,0.00005743504,0.01660874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005000472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01672822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05614979750386826,"score_gpt":0.315459394141712,"score_spread":0.2593095966378438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}