{"id":"W2096736443","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.17.002","title":"The Temporal Logic Model Concept","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Computer science; Documentation; Logic model; Temporal logic; Context (archaeology); Adaptation (eye); Accountability; Process (computing); Temporal logic of actions; Duration (music); Space (punctuation); Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Interval temporal logic; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social science; History; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00436114,0.0007670767,0.0003861582,0.001810089,0.001375712,0.005714958,0.002344748,0.002183182,0.01736139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004575704,0.0003638018,0.00155696,0.001584847,0.006448371,0.01048662,0.002382702,0.003226533,0.001757722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00540888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00379482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005082281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002763348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963256,0.001805178,0.0002071413,0.0005234276,0.0008669579,0.0002717434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964128,0.001977123,0.0002827923,0.0004052448,0.0006690514,0.0002529139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007575659,0.000008395612,0.00004369,0.00001820944,0.000003429489,0.00002464092,0.00009675568,0.001002289,0.00005367616,0.995693,0.0006627414,0.002385447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002697852,0.00002524305,0.00005540218,0.00008327083,0.00001405038,0.0001255435,0.0001842997,0.02491461,0.0004512289,0.9297289,0.0443746,0.00001587184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008271641,0.001013771,0.8486045,0.008530144,0.0004995805,0.0001789256,0.0004770053,0.0003617365,0.1320627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5739535,0.001276701,0.3895704,0.002526937,0.0004734145,0.0008430986,0.0006366851,0.0001915263,0.0305276],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01736139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05807966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5968884418094136,"score_gpt":0.4888732088178995,"score_spread":0.1080152329915141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}