{"id":"W2096739863","doi":"10.1080/17470210902794148","title":"Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: Evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Contingency table; Judgement; Psychology; Contingency; Causation; Statistical hypothesis testing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004261433,0.000136453,0.000414475,0.0003078256,0.0000216271,0.00001297521,0.0001609834,0.00008988586,0.0001262664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009573947,0.0001259094,0.00007317321,0.0001468445,0.0001143234,0.0005903362,0.00001035615,0.0001908313,0.000003179089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002413076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003081303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005633704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003876612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981658,0.0001519671,0.001152336,0.0001439303,0.0002000849,0.0001858565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981826,0.0003536454,0.001128028,0.0001308423,0.0001491431,0.00005576867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001981476,0.001552275,0.07369024,0.00004354439,0.0001246503,0.0000591929,0.02993009,0.00001254246,0.8216355,0.001776157,0.0002421395,0.06895217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001695563,0.01106652,0.9584193,0.0005603799,0.00002058138,0.0002303934,0.003487578,0.00001023809,0.02411896,0.0002301879,0.00002718613,0.0001331548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970922,0.001385757,0.00009537143,0.0001510175,0.0001305625,0.000127863,0.000004612944,0.000003132858,0.001009501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984752,0.00005091923,0.001321393,0.0001098837,0.00002332963,0.000001459966,6.706503e-7,0.000005373162,0.00001176089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.884729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5134435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04447640401163269,"score_gpt":0.3426668291539978,"score_spread":0.2981904251423652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}