{"id":"W2096739863","doi":"10.1080/17470210902794148","title":"Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: Evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Contingency table; Judgement; Psychology; Contingency; Causation; Statistical hypothesis testing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008588473,0.0004367308,0.0004206899,0.001252457,0.0003340702,0.001254134,0.0009432264,0.0007782013,0.004542738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09166298,0.0005119938,0.0002847101,0.0005728217,0.002060315,0.002538161,0.001936585,0.001099645,0.0003839493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004566997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004160346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001318267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001683141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931938,0.002667214,0.0005160969,0.0009599369,0.002419393,0.0002436126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8605313,0.1083099,0.01112108,0.01348891,0.004032804,0.002516101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005629671,0.002416364,0.5190265,0.0007243089,0.0006067122,0.001320314,0.01034148,0.008086969,0.120583,0.04502949,0.001344601,0.2848907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003239991,0.002802181,0.7726901,0.0001294328,0.0002596792,0.00254951,0.003095133,0.07661349,0.03621908,0.1021251,0.002990722,0.000201637],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830079,0.00007799522,0.00852879,0.0001013492,0.000008334626,0.00002737686,0.00003754664,0.00002543932,0.008185293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968922,0.00002313443,0.002710666,0.00003877093,0.000003877476,0.00001396704,0.00004315684,0.00001204935,0.0002621791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008588473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04542077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04447640401163269,"score_gpt":0.3426668291539978,"score_spread":0.2981904251423652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}