{"id":"W2096768069","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.03.001","title":"Empirical insights and considerations for the OBT inter-laboratory comparison of environmental samples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Radioactivity","topic":"Radioactive contamination and transfer","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"Canadian Nuclear Laboratories; Atomic Energy of Canada Limited","keywords":"Quality assurance; Environmental science; Certified reference materials; Environmental research; Certification; Environmental chemistry; Environmental resource management; Chemistry; Engineering; External quality assessment; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2051072,0.0009744963,0.001283811,0.003013269,0.003195111,0.008150075,0.004276525,0.002108788,0.004485492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.466693,0.0005367863,0.001480784,0.003584752,0.00648035,0.007862276,0.00492412,0.002287097,0.0006723874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003436328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004222417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01805732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01583973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8197641,0.1427573,0.008612669,0.008028181,0.01850202,0.002335679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3944607,0.5249811,0.02085097,0.02725017,0.03131646,0.001140538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006282946,0.002915327,0.6917272,0.001785053,0.002940775,0.0008980681,0.01654663,0.01417207,0.00982417,0.08400479,0.008608141,0.1602948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005743089,0.006696643,0.6662644,0.001654345,0.002795899,0.001180351,0.08532587,0.04411926,0.04285596,0.1081698,0.03999326,0.0003699529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7519162,0.004839409,0.1606607,0.01662228,0.001134005,0.001876883,0.00381261,0.0003314798,0.05880659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631959,0.000442332,0.03159212,0.001218009,0.000222097,0.0005498817,0.0008950337,0.0001115866,0.001773117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2051072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02861075237997105,"score_gpt":0.2711815212685633,"score_spread":0.2425707688885922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}