{"id":"W2096863564","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0148","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Argument map; Philosophy; Linguistics; Argumentation theory","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002617421,0.0001933808,0.0002193398,0.0001410646,0.0001709588,0.00002699284,0.00007140215,0.0001522042,0.0006793478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004858327,0.0001578132,0.00005061316,0.0002857803,0.00004686186,0.0001343741,0.00005256977,0.000179453,0.0009275906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003658366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007499278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001168649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988002,0.0001234909,0.0002131053,0.0003242137,0.0001518931,0.0003871194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999294,0.00008714633,0.00006577775,0.0002135542,0.00003608977,0.0003034461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002086358,0.000576982,0.006707788,0.0000495063,0.0002351054,0.0000406664,0.01580289,3.600905e-7,0.0006909444,0.9561412,0.001986717,0.01755925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00364219,0.001684557,0.08559831,0.00008798892,0.0005163257,0.0006457533,0.00123106,0.000005385825,0.0007277504,0.8335985,0.07083903,0.001423148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6238887,0.01689965,0.0001278825,0.002012684,0.00413719,0.0004920446,0.00001014304,0.0001508569,0.3522808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953216,0.0002864023,0.00007336348,0.0009864946,0.0008648395,0.00006825705,0.00001022266,0.00002251261,0.002366261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3714329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03117581066464339,"score_gpt":0.3006801159728074,"score_spread":0.269504305308164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}