{"id":"W2097144268","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2010.0167","title":"Dynamic energy budget theory and population ecology: lessons from <i>Daphnia</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Daphnia; Population; Biology; Energy budget; Population model; Organism; Population ecology; Population cycle; Zooplankton; Predation; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006493769,0.0003271732,0.0004936229,0.0004774304,0.0003026723,0.001035296,0.001075173,0.0008682387,0.001612077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002137283,0.0002324766,0.0005733037,0.0005373811,0.00188733,0.003057182,0.001041794,0.001830438,0.0002671655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001131371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005019321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00688191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003479337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998804,0.0000409958,0.0000100085,0.00002595322,0.00002481286,0.00001777299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993254,0.000415871,0.00005653585,0.00006819941,0.000085102,0.00004891632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001423369,0.00003488454,0.00630912,0.0001528201,0.00005104413,0.0001444539,0.0003586271,0.1073403,0.0007128201,0.8283939,0.004292686,0.05219509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005475889,0.00001351256,0.002461948,0.00004348347,0.000009324533,0.00006308107,0.0001554449,0.09930792,0.0001405083,0.8895791,0.008202199,0.00001807167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513348,0.03746354,0.5528892,0.06542883,0.0007704631,0.00002905646,0.0004539438,0.0003552948,0.09127497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469597,0.01196083,0.03192793,0.002316381,0.0006183066,0.00004341815,0.0001315319,0.00008113892,0.005960667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00688191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01368374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01320654296043052,"score_gpt":0.2436583434647361,"score_spread":0.2304518005043055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}