{"id":"W2097454728","doi":"10.33776/candb.v4i1.3015","title":"“Through a glass, darkly”: The metaphor of the lens in public discussions about the Canadian Museum for Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada and Beyond A Journal of Canadian Literary and Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Metaphor; Rhetoric; Sociology; Media studies; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Scholarship; Vision; Politics; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; History; Anthropology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002777966,0.0001393546,0.0002765029,0.00007996036,0.003821915,0.0001674375,0.0003216249,0.00002390009,0.00001592138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006625697,0.00005057533,0.00008153846,0.0001221681,0.0006552931,0.0002957239,0.000045312,0.0002044951,5.687354e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003651504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9582106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990156,0.0001319444,0.0003557606,0.00008847431,0.0001551898,0.0002530524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.0001911985,0.0001910011,0.0001549157,0.0003089973,0.0001184218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000722459,0.000008668234,0.00103778,0.0000282145,0.0003655839,0.000002607263,0.09612994,6.08271e-7,0.000003813455,0.7780739,0.1226931,0.001648571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002005722,0.00003981202,0.006537723,0.00006230485,0.0000613955,0.00001098881,0.02002023,0.000001945117,0.000002898872,0.01040805,0.9625661,0.00008799722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6061146,0.06908475,5.923123e-7,0.2942428,0.001291934,0.0005507525,0.0003377421,0.000004083287,0.02837273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948344,0.0006138908,0.000006760932,0.002662466,0.0002192565,0.00001660229,0.000002797223,0.000004502754,0.001639316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.839873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06492808822135711,"score_gpt":0.2534313085110243,"score_spread":0.1885032202896672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}