{"id":"W2097519255","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2013.31004","title":"Nanotechnologies and Ethical Argumentation: A Philosophical Stalemate?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Stalemate; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Pragmatism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophical theory; Action (physics); Sociology; Relation (database); Moral relativism; Philosophy; Relativism; Politics; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552926,0.0001797009,0.0003313142,0.000255863,0.0002614621,0.0003833173,0.001021839,0.0002423821,0.0008251983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001966171,0.0001437445,0.00006179739,0.0004656592,0.001120463,0.0007122086,0.000564151,0.001468442,0.0001249187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000399125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008397593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003722059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.587521e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978067,0.0001959898,0.0007765097,0.0003178965,0.000651391,0.0002515315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982807,0.000473137,0.0005451604,0.0002691427,0.0002595703,0.0001723006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005290106,0.0001865619,0.0000663303,0.00003587306,0.00002154669,0.0001100752,0.0001782151,0.000001932581,0.4377683,0.5558157,0.002978823,0.002783802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009089005,0.0005498122,0.0002214211,0.0001036227,0.00001448311,0.0002609173,0.00005059691,0.00002458803,0.1120269,0.8842866,0.001385908,0.0001662076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4528953,0.00007013636,0.0008272165,0.533361,0.0006025168,0.0008105946,0.00001530994,0.00006453579,0.01135345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854688,0.0001329767,0.002591392,0.01142735,0.0002576892,0.00002529567,7.768932e-7,0.00001987379,0.00007582613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5325736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9035343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1055635401210409,"score_gpt":0.3596583637836699,"score_spread":0.254094823662629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}