{"id":"W2097519255","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2013.31004","title":"Nanotechnologies and Ethical Argumentation: A Philosophical Stalemate?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Stalemate; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Pragmatism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophical theory; Action (physics); Sociology; Relation (database); Moral relativism; Philosophy; Relativism; Politics; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06666684,0.001168558,0.00225711,0.004896699,0.01119671,0.02526008,0.004330174,0.02140828,0.005685702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05333153,0.001274555,0.001687027,0.003368711,0.1128157,0.05831237,0.01532977,0.02806564,0.001511577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009315041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009842855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001741358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001615647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9409322,0.0430331,0.002118898,0.00308905,0.009086519,0.00174034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9093301,0.07210716,0.004707335,0.005114771,0.006187062,0.00255369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009058816,0.00001747915,0.00008179429,0.000106989,0.00001001858,0.00003436158,0.004333952,0.0001211409,0.00006613004,0.9892612,0.00212607,0.003831933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001447361,0.00001013102,0.00004980727,0.0001661548,0.000003152757,0.00005108279,0.002569009,0.0002577803,0.00004587905,0.9825906,0.01422873,0.00001321305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0093899,0.03840149,0.06434134,0.8307955,0.0034688,0.00005183469,0.0000413879,0.0000764721,0.05343335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7635269,0.03149123,0.07181381,0.1118793,0.008673677,0.0007447128,0.00008139769,0.0002838958,0.01150504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1055635401210409,"score_gpt":0.3596583637836699,"score_spread":0.254094823662629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}