{"id":"W2097566528","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.113.136663","title":"Performance Assessment of a Preclinical PET Scanner with Pinhole Collimation by Comparison to a Coincidence-Based Small-Animal PET Scanner","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","topic":"Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; TRIUMF","keywords":"Pinhole (optics); Collimated light; Imaging phantom; Collimator; Scanner; Nuclear medicine; Image resolution; Materials science; Optics; Pet imaging; Coincidence; Physics; Positron emission tomography; Medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001489117,0.0001662485,0.0007536794,0.0001842489,0.00007043118,0.0000112292,0.0002291716,0.00004596593,0.0004049699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004356772,0.0001057543,0.00008201893,0.0003174142,0.0002775147,0.00007298899,0.00003450148,0.0004945134,0.000007233516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002212113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003144383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003428626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976526,0.0000844527,0.0009808115,0.0001951218,0.0008707255,0.0002162301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977542,0.0001842933,0.0007121474,0.0003126729,0.0005823615,0.0004543361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004585343,0.003340957,0.09177585,0.001115358,0.0003115431,0.0001579709,0.0007924938,0.0006584641,0.2019808,0.0009276441,0.6837046,0.01064903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0127146,0.04148432,0.2124861,0.008610315,0.001212203,0.002230741,0.0006478853,0.5254834,0.002503292,0.00004269934,0.1920952,0.0004892726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211715,0.00002271549,0.01241743,0.06418145,0.00006156772,0.0004040085,0.000004414168,0.0000360438,0.00170084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910562,0.0000297658,0.0857093,0.003315589,0.0002601605,0.000009390644,0.00001092855,0.00002886009,0.00007400577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5248249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4434136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03832270452519978,"score_gpt":0.368591297640627,"score_spread":0.3302685931154273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}