{"id":"W2097674041","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00094-0","title":"Structural change tests for simulated method of moments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometrics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Monte Carlo method; Moment (physics); Mathematics; Sample size determination; Applied mathematics; Method of moments (probability theory); Null hypothesis; Sample (material); Power (physics); Asymptotic analysis; Generalized method of moments; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Statistics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001782162,0.0001826269,0.0008745628,0.001627375,0.00005726294,0.0000404906,0.0002875101,0.0001320229,0.0005503104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00122252,0.0001943915,0.0003739432,0.0005786007,0.00003134843,0.0006295656,0.00002075248,0.0001576689,0.00003022846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001657185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002583988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005478126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001595357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977446,0.00002596017,0.001629232,0.0002134649,0.00003376973,0.0003529878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968966,0.0004208881,0.002185702,0.000245847,0.00007118256,0.0001797412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042559,0.0006247669,0.7174523,0.0005235243,0.00217607,0.00001501601,0.002669438,0.08014552,0.00008573967,0.1730442,0.005001683,0.01783604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01673803,0.004382576,0.2711035,0.0001106991,0.000235965,0.0004168084,0.0004223396,0.1491172,0.002657091,0.332447,0.2202051,0.002163575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778722,0.003898821,0.01210767,0.0002282191,0.001523376,0.0003890682,0.0004091152,0.000007374864,0.003564139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812288,0.0002215668,0.01784571,0.0002233926,0.0002132709,0.000003196516,0.000005501129,0.00002795191,0.0002305794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4463488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7927055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4962968868289526,"score_gpt":0.3220458823615703,"score_spread":0.1742510044673823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}