{"id":"W2097728539","doi":"10.1016/j.yqres.2012.05.014","title":"Comparison of stable carbon and oxygen isotopes in <i>Picea glauca</i> tree rings and <i>Sphagnum fuscum</i> moss remains from subarctic Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quaternary Research","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Sphagnum; Subarctic climate; Peat; Isotopes of oxygen; Stable isotope ratio; Moss; Isotopes of carbon; Dendrochronology; Dendroclimatology; Environmental science; Taiga; Geology; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Environmental chemistry; Total organic carbon; Chemistry; Oceanography; Biology; Paleontology; Geochemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212435,0.0001703385,0.0003666583,0.0001704525,0.0001301674,0.00006652348,0.0002833174,0.00008241436,0.000136287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001375818,0.000149367,0.00001805193,0.0003263342,0.0002132765,0.000281826,0.00009716766,0.0003715721,0.000009293491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003689436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002116111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9410611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9085497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972481,0.0004750779,0.0003592564,0.0003403478,0.0007337392,0.0008435142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980426,0.001231524,0.00007394078,0.0002836386,0.00004438803,0.0003239369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003051673,0.00004062536,0.9936802,0.00009474539,0.00001707646,0.00003778991,0.001024145,0.00003330645,0.002206518,0.000003545562,0.0001659448,0.002390949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004506246,0.0001556546,0.9848119,0.00007240244,0.00000792295,0.00001096459,0.0009399956,0.008232379,0.003670947,0.00008034275,0.001401214,0.0001656777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896597,0.008256225,4.796811e-7,0.0003502192,0.0001168406,0.0002393314,0.0001354801,0.0000146837,0.001227039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989904,0.0004022317,0.0001032812,0.0000299302,0.00007847215,0.00000380501,0.00003877695,0.00000990486,0.0003432017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03251146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6091009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05585045292156636,"score_gpt":0.3174345709138402,"score_spread":0.2615841179922738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}