{"id":"W2097797616","doi":"10.4141/s04-087","title":"Soil organic carbon as an indicator of environmental quality at the national scale: Inventory monitoring methods and policy relevance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil carbon; Soil water; Soil quality; Index (typography); Soil organic matter; Agriculture; Environmental quality; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Soil science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001985654,0.00008429962,0.0001266104,0.00006612732,0.0003462762,0.00004656272,0.000446425,0.00005152341,0.00005361619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000406007,0.00003808012,0.00004558768,0.000413171,0.000926158,0.0002357834,0.00004882381,0.0001541576,0.000001609277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005473758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005848251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01175391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09027974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986699,0.0001340579,0.0002772897,0.0001697166,0.0004856572,0.0002633467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989243,0.0001114456,0.0002581546,0.00005115281,0.00008193477,0.0005729989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417932,0.00002897365,0.3558037,0.000002949599,0.000009277451,0.000002234987,0.0009760713,0.00006447231,0.5622783,0.0001412425,0.00001105297,0.08066753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009756451,0.0001146621,0.9311879,0.00001234348,0.000007069884,0.00007074779,0.0007038944,0.0006080547,0.06620315,0.0005383829,0.0003483268,0.0001079419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978687,0.0005498985,3.134774e-7,0.001036274,0.0001235605,0.00003604917,0.00001510331,0.000002361652,0.0003678065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990629,0.00006989551,0.0001522585,0.0002419575,0.0004202762,7.424745e-7,6.190911e-7,0.000001053401,0.00005028698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5753841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02462024539908626,"score_gpt":0.297344579823486,"score_spread":0.2727243344243998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}