{"id":"W2097797616","doi":"10.4141/s04-087","title":"Soil organic carbon as an indicator of environmental quality at the national scale: Inventory monitoring methods and policy relevance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil carbon; Soil water; Soil quality; Index (typography); Soil organic matter; Agriculture; Environmental quality; Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Soil science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004038442,0.0004448476,0.0003031369,0.001820933,0.0003305149,0.0012771,0.0006941593,0.0003783312,0.0004608481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007271412,0.0002315411,0.0002258404,0.003434068,0.000489427,0.002054245,0.00060313,0.000355361,0.00009426124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002800333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002008487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02287519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984508,0.0006855935,0.0001155765,0.0002834191,0.0004161953,0.00004844607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969778,0.00116278,0.0007694541,0.0002847626,0.0007370876,0.00006815572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001591754,0.0002873912,0.4696113,0.0003929289,0.0001766318,0.00009798772,0.0003683022,0.0729624,0.004990821,0.01449808,0.001889721,0.4345653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005159781,0.0004243875,0.4746293,0.0003410679,0.0001853532,0.000317215,0.0009055283,0.4600074,0.02216394,0.01881985,0.02194252,0.0002116649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.541579,0.006204494,0.4130213,0.002010253,0.00006595998,0.0008653305,0.005115224,0.0005451518,0.03059326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546155,0.003600081,0.2384719,0.0001558448,0.00006333921,0.0005991986,0.001214634,0.00003983873,0.001239691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04548407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02462024539908626,"score_gpt":0.297344579823486,"score_spread":0.2727243344243998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}