{"id":"W2097872343","doi":"10.1186/2046-4053-3-140","title":"Methodological issues and recommendations for systematic reviews of prognostic studies: an example from cardiovascular disease","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Montreal Heart Institute","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Medicine; Systematic review; Checklist; Terminology; Identification (biology); MEDLINE; Disease; Management science; Pathology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5584393,0.002462576,0.1390351,0.0009022676,0.0003678418,0.001050627,0.004868886,0.0005007926,0.0008797886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5867139,0.000919828,0.02861816,0.00212036,0.0002365396,0.0004424188,0.0005188423,0.0004262168,0.001763393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001531786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001747866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006580447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001931633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.633542,0.2949419,0.06297655,0.003413293,0.004543347,0.0005828872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6794038,0.2077688,0.08177832,0.02659062,0.003390483,0.001068079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001663987,0.00006333966,0.000002658529,0.9087864,0.005190262,0.000002537872,0.0005444482,8.324805e-7,3.490832e-8,0.0007881582,0.01234855,0.07227115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034241,0.00005895905,2.747003e-7,0.3941008,0.03702776,0.00002129994,0.0004013414,0.0001755057,1.563686e-8,0.001678316,0.5659461,0.0004862383],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[9.029087e-7,0.8345203,0.05428113,0.00006698399,0.0006534036,0.1102513,0.0001554689,0.00001957455,0.00005091762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002446633,0.9001376,0.04519349,0.00007199834,0.0003867432,0.05239813,0.0002621791,0.0001013617,0.001446048],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5535976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.955733901381123,"score_gpt":0.6387188500388223,"score_spread":0.3170150513423007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}