{"id":"W2097891797","doi":"10.1109/icassp.2006.1660650","title":"On the Competitive Neyman-Pearson Approach for Composite Hypothesis Testing and its Application in Voice Activity Detection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Speech and Audio Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Detector; Constant false alarm rate; Statistical hypothesis testing; False alarm; Upper and lower bounds; Computer science; Composite number; Detection theory; Speech recognition; Algorithm; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002473386,0.00008419077,0.00008082055,0.00005754625,0.0002006038,0.0001171483,0.0001647371,0.00003098611,2.34499e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009913801,0.0000621462,0.00001593672,0.0003162561,0.0000159214,0.0002339588,0.00003042419,0.00008123265,0.000003059881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003528427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001008311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001336031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000784412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993522,0.00003961142,0.00008718974,0.0002748674,0.00009898688,0.0001471966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988459,0.0008990898,0.00007089243,0.0001193016,0.00004676727,0.0000180823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003170504,0.0001900177,0.001248365,0.00005014573,0.000005182175,5.084282e-7,0.0001236869,0.0009571173,0.5625117,0.008450558,0.00001668759,0.4264143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846254,0.00004222511,0.02688921,0.00001392296,0.00000238776,0.000004540346,0.00001966821,0.4183015,0.5504979,0.003932542,0.00001837453,0.00009305491],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3812548,0.00001450894,0.6122027,0.0002871112,0.000009376293,0.000300379,6.39733e-7,0.00006631738,0.005864143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271314,4.393011e-7,0.07257411,0.0001446163,0.00003290396,0.00007567751,3.368791e-7,0.000004936335,0.00003563596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5458766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2534249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02769964180215238,"score_gpt":0.2294740921063833,"score_spread":0.2017744503042309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}