{"id":"W2098041255","doi":"10.1175/2008jtecha1077.1","title":"On the Possible Use of Copolar Correlation Coefficient for Improving the Drop Size Distribution Estimates at C Band","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","topic":"Precipitation Measurement and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disdrometer; Correlation coefficient; Reflectivity; Environmental science; Remote sensing; Drop (telecommunication); Radar; Atmospheric sciences; Physics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Optics; Geology; Rain gauge","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087886,0.0009411756,0.0004732709,0.002166398,0.0002507673,0.0008526021,0.0008032098,0.0004480392,0.001173405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006515201,0.0003148183,0.0003590728,0.001660257,0.0002226011,0.0008827371,0.0004650479,0.000497882,0.0008493367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001752969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003787753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003990055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006038626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993218,0.0003480774,0.00003367088,0.0001351327,0.0001132388,0.00004803049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959934,0.001719755,0.0003553371,0.0006261659,0.001190061,0.00011528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005312529,0.0002912842,0.07006211,0.0004742763,0.0002286695,0.0001979555,0.000202332,0.03345325,0.2997115,0.004469726,0.005400234,0.5849775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007981557,0.000309856,0.08566621,0.00009388013,0.0002177392,0.0004984655,0.0001298856,0.7000387,0.1972803,0.002059189,0.01343617,0.0001898003],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1703579,0.001025207,0.8215007,0.0003376462,0.0001084814,0.0001231887,0.0005853875,0.002757303,0.003204141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4840021,0.0007019932,0.5129517,0.0001451391,0.00009991117,0.00008728723,0.0007198494,0.0002413057,0.001050592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003990055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01104194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01495507239830783,"score_gpt":0.1992785740303869,"score_spread":0.1843235016320791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}