{"id":"W2098041255","doi":"10.1175/2008jtecha1077.1","title":"On the Possible Use of Copolar Correlation Coefficient for Improving the Drop Size Distribution Estimates at C Band","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","topic":"Precipitation Measurement and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disdrometer; Correlation coefficient; Reflectivity; Environmental science; Remote sensing; Drop (telecommunication); Radar; Atmospheric sciences; Physics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Optics; Geology; Rain gauge","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000342531,0.0000702804,0.000143458,0.000006346649,0.0003347544,0.00001898242,0.0001215949,0.00006065298,0.00009075978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007276199,0.00003545248,0.00006313645,0.0002598917,0.0001864513,0.00009338832,0.000007539226,0.0001128927,0.000001779719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001141373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003562861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000214798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001260091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993539,0.00002920332,0.0002618383,0.00007559051,0.0001688235,0.0001106105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986401,0.0007350083,0.0003782799,0.00008888033,0.0001336218,0.00002409633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000415199,0.00007417853,0.9487473,0.00002701902,0.0001650596,0.000007396538,0.0003445545,0.0204656,0.002791854,0.001707189,0.003854484,0.02140012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009805124,0.001436271,0.6123155,0.00005395435,0.0002559958,0.0001800592,0.0006967792,0.3757483,0.003637749,0.002994138,0.001533849,0.000166819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764982,0.0009327956,0.0215517,0.0007803624,0.00009528477,0.0001027314,0.00001526886,0.000008662952,0.00001497959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984658,0.0001276071,0.001267149,0.00005450985,0.00001652111,3.240189e-7,0.000005116247,0.000001758195,0.00006118102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3552827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2574694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01495507239830783,"score_gpt":0.1992785740303869,"score_spread":0.1843235016320791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}