{"id":"W2098145679","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2009-0032","title":"A COMPUTERIZED APPROACH FOR TOLERANCE ANALYSIS OF DISK CAM MECHANISMS WITH A FLAT-FACED FOLLOWER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Offset (computer science); Oblique case; Control theory (sociology); Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Tolerance analysis; Simulation; Engineering drawing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002384873,0.0002167205,0.0004996303,0.000182808,0.0001434147,0.00002379125,0.0003682941,0.0001824722,0.00001254238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002240569,0.0001824947,0.0009828777,0.001214516,0.00002190475,0.00007931651,0.000003944973,0.0002291267,1.110248e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001769946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009618558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004249306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001126679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987445,0.000007539228,0.0003579035,0.0002241095,0.0002309681,0.0004349252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.0001120696,0.00003856653,0.0004091171,0.0001102767,0.0002401667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002026791,0.00002256164,1.508613e-7,0.0001548844,0.001012561,6.382755e-8,0.00009502623,0.9534404,0.03391752,0.01061261,0.00003383431,0.0006900842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006603191,0.0001270198,0.00001381952,0.00003586935,0.0005735257,0.00000124914,0.00002980292,0.9729558,0.02499701,0.0002057022,0.0001989441,0.0002008923],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004696285,0.00004730843,0.9937584,0.0001289446,0.0001226357,0.0007789565,0.0003269386,0.0001196389,0.00002089895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7326462,0.00000668622,0.2670766,0.00002892565,0.0000153094,0.0001368521,0.00002588726,0.00003351483,0.00002994551],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7441919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01061596485702303,"score_gpt":0.2128405786329343,"score_spread":0.2022246137759113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}