{"id":"W2098145679","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2009-0032","title":"A COMPUTERIZED APPROACH FOR TOLERANCE ANALYSIS OF DISK CAM MECHANISMS WITH A FLAT-FACED FOLLOWER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Offset (computer science); Oblique case; Control theory (sociology); Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Tolerance analysis; Simulation; Engineering drawing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003240859,0.0006460897,0.0005446385,0.001149694,0.0003083833,0.0006838464,0.001184508,0.0006694213,0.003232756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001779302,0.0003200296,0.0006042168,0.0005607079,0.0004444552,0.0006640694,0.0005986108,0.0004098817,0.0003688251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003147415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007821736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00142498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001339009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997076,0.00003811587,0.00001626542,0.0000474758,0.0001699293,0.00002059211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994523,0.0001953875,0.00009286751,0.0001123035,0.0001293805,0.00001779029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001336308,0.00009821702,0.003120752,0.0003188949,0.00005463776,0.000515306,0.0003969142,0.7072271,0.1063348,0.02937061,0.0005062319,0.1519229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002248243,0.0001220878,0.0009427324,0.0000185958,0.0000184024,0.0002441289,0.00007131723,0.9831696,0.009288708,0.0045975,0.001476938,0.00002755273],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.026399,0.00005772816,0.9720346,0.000009552679,0.000007248813,0.00003390901,0.00002396917,0.0002914973,0.001142453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6019027,0.0001744319,0.3958795,0.00001815237,0.00001400232,0.0001921029,0.00009617551,0.0001187265,0.001604193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003232756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01081461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01061596485702303,"score_gpt":0.2128405786329343,"score_spread":0.2022246137759113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}