{"id":"W2098271372","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043034","title":"Optimal, reliable estimation of quantum states","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":402,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Physics; Bayesian probability; Estimation; Quantum; Zero (linguistics); Maximum likelihood; Algorithm; Quantum state; State (computer science); Applied mathematics; Statistical physics; Statistics; Bayesian inference; Computer science; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002132378,0.00006502117,0.000133794,0.0000825079,0.00003681388,0.00006607591,0.0004285707,0.00002899126,0.00001661281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002193584,0.00005358408,0.00009773691,0.0003057769,0.00003045825,0.001226209,0.00003265529,0.000203698,0.00001352835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004870223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001331961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009188819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.475404e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991885,0.000009067576,0.000358631,0.00004758686,0.0002969419,0.00009926704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989361,0.00003681549,0.0005029845,0.0001896922,0.0002477017,0.00008668358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001963929,0.0001373199,0.0002046107,0.00003280232,0.0000364421,0.000002519309,0.002177607,0.09698837,0.007134895,0.768039,0.02085157,0.1043752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005657019,0.0002779933,0.0005069321,0.00003939311,0.00001183907,0.00003284445,0.00007318315,0.8250943,0.04909091,0.1184147,0.005778313,0.0001137831],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1761095,0.00002160169,0.8227917,0.0002880243,0.0004171266,0.00002298677,6.148991e-7,0.00001238714,0.0003360884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8031631,0.00002681786,0.196582,0.00009934163,0.0001080501,2.013013e-7,8.923491e-7,0.000003783849,0.00001577759],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.728106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2185095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01078175269495255,"score_gpt":0.2493925560377062,"score_spread":0.2386108033427536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}