{"id":"W2098299421","doi":"10.1017/s0950268805005108","title":"A molecular epidemiological analysis of the incursion of the raccoon strain of rabies virus into Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epidemiology and Infection","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Rabies; Rabies virus; Outbreak; Molecular epidemiology; Strain (injury); Virology; Biology; Lyssavirus; Raccoon Dogs; Geography; Transmission (telecommunications); Rhabdoviridae; Veterinary medicine; Zoology; Genotype; Genetics; Gene; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003421486,0.0001992942,0.001231152,0.0001200154,0.0002150199,5.179645e-7,0.0002641863,0.0005641197,0.000138801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006426619,0.0001081857,0.0004382275,0.0004660609,0.001395784,0.00005269871,0.0001545185,0.0004991174,0.000001465929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004899627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001276328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1059435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1296154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935087,0.004684519,0.001165878,0.0003042018,0.00003524941,0.0003014558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945362,0.003774337,0.001095195,0.0004664984,0.0001054054,0.00002237602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002474902,0.00008568352,0.8378697,0.0000302942,0.001724096,1.467451e-7,0.0001250492,0.009447342,0.1207703,0.02161803,0.001643919,0.006437993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004521171,0.0001559884,0.9651651,0.00002802973,0.0009259378,0.000007018908,0.00003933641,0.0005101253,0.02321425,0.004301889,0.00509398,0.0001061782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884844,0.00416858,0.001070375,0.005258428,0.000464372,0.0002291166,0.00005011938,0.0000106735,0.0002638762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973998,0.0003354226,0.00004330806,0.002088257,0.00002070248,0.00001732944,0.0000248855,0.000004973534,0.0000652924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1272954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01283298726204291,"score_gpt":0.2628255927297795,"score_spread":0.2499926054677366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}